Nikon DSLR Forums Home 

This site requires new users to accept that a small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikon-dslr.net after requesting a new account. Thank you.

 Moderated by: Robert, richw, jk  
AuthorPost
jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Please post your new bird images in this new topic.
This helps the topics load quickly for all members and allows us to remember more clearly where certain images that we are trying to find may be located.

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
I start by posting a few snaps

D500 with 200-500mm lens

#1 Common Tern


#2 Common Greenfinch


#3 Yellow-faced Honeyeater


#4 Red-browed Finch


#5 Striated Pardalote

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
#6 Sacred Kingfisher


#7 Wedged-tailed Eagle


#8 Eastern Yellow Robin


#9 Red-rumped Parrot


#10 Tawny Frogmouth

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4047
Status: 
Offline
Thank you Richard, a lovely set.

Gets 2021 off to a great start.

Edited date... Sorry!

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Great start to 2021 Richard.
Fine set of images.

GeoffR

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Thank you Richard, a lovely set.

Gets 2020 off to a great start.
Pardon? Let's not go through 2020 again.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Thank you Richard, a lovely set.

Gets 2020 off to a great start.
Noooooooooo

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline

Happy NY to All!  Richard more super photo thank you. Modest studio portrait of a tame Tawny Owl with studio flash and a D850 Nikon>.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Another pix from my studio session with my Tawny friend. Lighting is with pro electronic flash.

Click here to comment on this image.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
couple from me last Sunday fieldfares at a local industrial park ,luckily no traffic to spook them taken from the mobile mondeo hide olympus omd1-mkii + olympus 100-400 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Jeff super pixs, well done!!! I have been busy with a trail cam at night and took (not very good quality) footage of a fox catching a large rat under our bird table at 2.00 am in the morning -3C IR B&W not very good quality but interesting I have reset it again tonight. Plenty of rats at the moment with the local river Meon in flood.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Well instead of WinterWatch we will have WhistlerWatch! :lol:

Sounds like you are having fun Graham.  

You can upload mp4 file to Vimeo or YouTube and link to here so we can watch.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Instead of a Robin in the snow here's a Dunnock in the snow.


DN4_9623-Edit by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Nice one Ian. JK here is the trail cam footage from last two nights as requested.

https://www.facebook.com/graham.whistler/videos/10225730267072066

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
At least the Fox is trying to keep the rat count down for you Graham.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
You have quite a colony of rats there.  Need a second fox or a Jack Russell! :lol:

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
just signed a (model) release form for winter watch to use 2 of my images .. whether or not they appear is I presume down to schedules and overruns

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Which ones so we can look out for them.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
close up of a blackbird and a unspecified magpie Jonathon

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
blackfox wrote:
close up of a blackbird and a unspecified magpie Jonathon Are they paying you for their use?

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I would hope so but it is the BBC!

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
It was grey and overcast this morning, before the cloud moved away and it became bright and sunny. Great weather to put the Fujikon to the test.

These were all taken using a Fuji X-T3 with Fringer NF-FX adapter and Nikkor 200-500mm lens

#1 White-eared Honeyeater


#2 Yellow-faced Honeyeater


#3 Laughing Kookaburra


#4 Galah


#5 Little Wattlebird


#6 Red Wattlebird

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
#7 Eastern Rosella


#8 Red-browed Finch


#9 Willie Wagtail


#10 White-naped Honeyeater


#11 Spotted Pardalote


#12 Superb Fairy-wren

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Looks like you have it cracked Richard.  Lovely images.
So a 200-500 on an APS-C  Fuji XT3 camera so x1.5 straight away to 300-750mm. 
Looks like you have got the AF working well.
I guess you are using one up from smallest AF box and on AFS AF setting?.
XT4 with IBIS will give further flexibility but no better quality.



Pssst, dont tell Eric, he will be sorry he got rid of his XT3 but I am sure he is happy with the D850.

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Looks like you have it cracked Richard.  Lovely images.
So a 200-500 on an APS-C  Fuji XT3 camera so x1.5 straight away to 300-750mm. 
Looks like you have got the AF working well.
I guess you are using one up from smallest AF box and on AFS AF setting?.
XT4 with IBIS will give further flexibility but no better quality.



Pssst, dont tell Eric, he will be sorry he got rid of his XT3 but I am sure he is happy with the D850.

I was having a few issues with focusing. According to the Fringer manual, if you use a smaller focus point the focusing uses contrast detect. Some birds worked fine using the larger focus point, whereas others, the Superb Fairy-wren for instance would not focus. Luckily the bird stayed around long enough for me to change the focus point to the small one and it focused straightaway.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Looks like you have it cracked Richard.  Lovely images.
So a 200-500 on an APS-C  Fuji XT3 camera so x1.5 straight away to 300-750mm. 
Looks like you have got the AF working well.
I guess you are using one up from smallest AF box and on AFS AF setting?.
XT4 with IBIS will give further flexibility but no better quality.



Pssst, dont tell Eric, he will be sorry he got rid of his XT3 but I am sure he is happy with the D850.
Not really. Although the IQ was very good there were aspects of the XT3 functionality I found less appealing.The D850 is superb camera but in all honesty more features than I am ever likely to use and heavy/bulky/expensive as a walk around camera...which tends to be my main requirement these days. Richard and Jeff’s image are spectacular to see, but I fear my commitment to bird photography will never be sufficient for the application required.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Not really. Although the IQ was very good there were aspects of the XT3 functionality I found less appealing.The D850 is superb camera but in all honesty more features than I am ever likely to use and heavy/bulky/expensive as a walk around camera...which tends to be my main requirement these days. Richard and Jeff’s image are spectacular to see, but I fear my commitment to bird photography will never be sufficient for the application required. I agree with you but I do find the XT3 a nice light camera to walk around with.  The battery can be a limitation but that is easily solved by a second battery.  The D850/Z7 really are superb cameras and I really dont push their capabilities these days.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
I’m afraid I gone back to using my D3 and 4 for wildlife as I can’t get away from the iq they produce. Yes there heavy but sometimes you have to have some give and take.

GeoffR

 

Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Denham, United Kingdom
Posts: 267
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I’m afraid I gone back to using my D3 and 4 for wildlife as I can’t get away from the iq they produce. Yes there heavy but sometimes you have to have some give and take. I never used anything else!


Except during the time before I had a D3.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
hi all winter watch used 3 of my images in the current series so quiet pleased , must be doing something right I suppose .. and no they dont pay to use them unfortunately ..photos below 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
blackfox wrote:
hi all winter watch used 3 of my images in the current series so quiet pleased , must be doing something right I suppose .. and no they dont pay to use them unfortunately ..photos below 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.
Well done Jeff. I did see the Turnstone image last night. Lovely image. 👍

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Well done on the images.
I have really enjoyed the Winterwatch series.  I find the presenters have worked well across all the sites. Weather has been pretty atrocious for them especially in Wales.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Well done on the images.
I have really enjoyed the Winterwatch series.  I find the presenters have worked well across all the sites. Weather has been pretty atrocious for them especially in Wales.
Not just Wales.
The bottom of our garden has gone sub aqua.:needsahug:

Not sure the bulbs around the trees and the roses in the border will survive, especially with sub zero temperatures coming this week to freeze the sodden ground. 



Click here to comment on this image.

Last edited on Sat Feb 6th, 2021 18:31 by Eric

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Oh dear, I feel for you.  All the garden work washed away!
Hope it isnt too cold this weekend and those bulbs survive.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
The heavy rains stopped, at last ..._but Storm Darcy turned up even more surprises this weekend...










A White Fronted Goose in the garden!





Click here to comment on this image.

Last edited on Tue Feb 9th, 2021 16:48 by Eric

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Remake of   ..... The Snow Goose.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
some good shots there Eric ,nice garden m8

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
been having a play with changing methods of P/P  while in lockdown ...i.e the boredom files .:doh:  they seem to be attracting a lot of likes on flickr so must be doing something right ... the good news is im getting the vaccine jab later today 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
A couple from last week.


DN4_1217-Edit by Iain Clyne, on Flickr



DN4_1259 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
blackfox wrote:
been having a play with changing methods of P/P  while in lockdown ...i.e the boredom files .:doh:  they seem to be attracting a lot of likes on flickr so must be doing something right ... the good news is im getting the vaccine jab later today 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.
The birds are nicely caught, but I am not sure I like the intense blurring of the background 🤔. I know I have a bit of a fixation about noise, but losing so much background detail makes the birds too divorced from their surroundings and a bit artificial for my taste.

Last edited on Wed Feb 10th, 2021 13:50 by Eric

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Here’s a buzzard I forgot to post from the Kite photography expedition.



Click here to comment on this image.

Last edited on Wed Feb 10th, 2021 14:24 by Eric

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Here’s a buzzard I forgot to post from the Kite photography expedition.



Click here to comment on this image.
The background is a bit blurred :lol:

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
chrisbet wrote:
The background is a bit blurred :lol: Yes but it’s natural bokeh without added computer blur.

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4047
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Here’s a buzzard I forgot to post from the Kite photography expedition.



Click here to comment on this image.
I like the sharp twigs and berries next to the subject, ...is there any chance you could flip it in Ps so we could see the front of the Buzzard?

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Unusual sight in the trees at the bottom of our garden....8 Magpies. 



Click here to comment on this image.



Apparently the saying is  “8 for a wish”. 

I wished they would come closer....but it didn’t work.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Need a longer lens?  Wishing for a 600mm?

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Here’s a buzzard I forgot to post from the Kite photography expedition.



Click here to comment on this image.
Nice shot Eric.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Need a longer lens? No.

That was right at the wide end of the zoom to get all 8 in the frame. If I used the extreme end I would have a shot of 2 or 3....and you wouldn’t have believed there were 8....so maybe an unrealistic wasted wish.
o.O

Last edited on Fri Feb 12th, 2021 20:32 by Eric

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
I like the sharp twigs and berries next to the subject, ...is there any chance you could flip it in Ps so we could see the front of the Buzzard? I did look but it’s all white on the other side. ;-)

Theres a couple of buzzard regularly sitting on field posts near the supermarket we visit. Will see if I can get them to turn and face me on Sunday. :thumbs:

Robert



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: South Lakeland, UK
Posts: 4047
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
I did look but it’s all white on the other side. ;-)

Theres a couple of buzzard regularly sitting on field posts near the supermarket we visit. Will see if I can get them to turn and face me on Sunday. :thumbs:
Thats all white then! :lol:

You must have a very rural supermarket, or very urban buzzards?  Looking forward to a frontal portrait.

Living in the country I rarely see buzzards, Perhaps I'm not looking in the right places.  I saw a small but rather nice murmuration last week (not of buzzards! LOL).

While at my friend Bob's near Cartmel last week I spotted an unusual bush growing in the thicket of a small, dense woodland which looked completely out of place, Bob called it a pheasant berry bush, he didn't know the botanic name but it's actually Leycesteria formosa, the Himalayan honeysuckle, just growing wild in Cumbria. It attracts birds and deer for the berries.  I intend to photograph it when it flowers.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Good to see that you are back posting Robert.
Hope that you are feeling stronger and more recovered.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Robert wrote:
Thats all white then! :lol:

You must have a very rural supermarket, or very urban buzzards?  Looking forward to a frontal portrait.

Living in the country I rarely see buzzards, Perhaps I'm not looking in the right places.  I saw a small but rather nice murmuration last week (not of buzzards! LOL).

While at my friend Bob's near Cartmel last week I spotted an unusual bush growing in the thicket of a small, dense woodland which looked completely out of place, Bob called it a pheasant berry bush, he didn't know the botanic name but it's actually Leycesteria formosa, the Himalayan honeysuckle, just growing wild in Cumbria. It attracts birds and deer for the berries.  I intend to photograph it when it flowers.
Buzzards often perch on fence posts alongside main roads. Because they are brown you tend to miss them, thinking they were extra long posts. 😆 

Travelling down the motorways in France they are everywhere. We refer to them as “awks on steeks”. (French accent required)
Driving to Alsace in 2018 we counted 83 such ‘awks’ plus 7 eagles...it was in fairness a drive of several hours and of course towing a caravan the speed is sloooower.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Didnt get the Buzzards yesterday. 


Did get a rook landing on the tree near the house and a song thrush came down to grab some of the food that had been scattered on the snow...before it melted.





Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
having changed my style of p/p slightly with some excellent response on flickr etc I have been re-visiting old files .. heres 2

Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

 recently done ones from when I had the d7200

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Very good!

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Great pair of images Jeff.


It is very nice seeing the final images but I cant assess what they started from!
That is the other skilled part of the equation.

From a professional perspective .........
First you need to capture the image
Then you need to process the image.
Then ultimately you need to sell the image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
I have always admired Jeff’s skill as a wildlife photographer, his use of light, field craft and mastery of whatever equipment he uses. (Puts my half hearted efforts to shame) 

But I have to say that whilst differential focus between subject and background always lifts the subject from its surroundings , I am not a fan of totally blurred surroundings in wildlife photos. 

For me, part of the pleasure is seeing the habitat. Having completely blurred surroundings may make the subject stand out more but it takes a well executed natural looking shot and moves it too close to an illustration....what a friend refers to as a ‘bird stamp’.

I know all our taste differ, but I prefer more interaction between the subject and it’s habitat.:hardhat:

Great captures though:bowing:

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I dont mind the ultra defocussed background but it doesnt work for every subject.  I use the technique in some portraits but it is a bit like the Orton effect in landscapes.  If you do it in/on every image it becomes a very artificial image as you say.  I like to see the background in cthe context.

The owl image looks very much like an Eric Hoskings image but I dont know if he did that on his images or whether they are just naturally like that.
The swallow shot is great timing and very sharp but as you say it would be nice to see a bit more background or surrounding detail.  He is on a skim over the wall, but where did he come from?

I just wish I had the patience and fieldcraft that Jeff has to capture these images.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I guess it begs the question.  Which is better?



or



Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
For me the problem with just blurring the background is twofold ....

A constant degree of blur assumes everything in the background is the same distance behind the subject....like a studio portrait background. 
That’s fine if that’s what you are trying to achieve....a portrait of a critter. I just don’t find flying birds... ‘studio subjects’.
In a natural setting, a portrait benefits from sharing some of the surroundings in the composition, ideally then with a more natural progressive zone of sharpness/defocus behind. I like to see some habitat with the creature. No it’s not an excuse for not getting close enough. 😂  



The other issue is, just blurring the background without reframing unbalances the image. There is too much blurred background which distracts from the subject. In your hummingbird moth image there is far too much out of focus to the left. (I realise it’s been done just to make a point). It needs tighter cropping ...which then turns it back into a tight studio portrait. 




Click here to comment on this image.



That still works ok in this case because you have the plant as part of the composition. With flying birds there is unlikely to have anything to balance the composition.

Hope that makes sense?


Incidentally, somewhere on my desktop I have a PS Action that sequentially layers focus progressively back in stages giving increasing levels of defocus away from a subject to give quite a natural depth of field effect. I created it after messing up a shoot with the wrong aperture. 😂

Last edited on Sat Feb 20th, 2021 19:59 by Eric

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
I prefer the first image Eric with the background not blurry. I have tried to get away from the bird etc dominating the image and where the background is acceptable leave it visible as habitat.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I thought I would do that one of the Hummingbird moth as I was never sure if I liked the background in the original, but maybe the problem was the crop I made!
I prefer your crop.


Re: " Incidentally, somewhere on my desktop I have a PS Action that sequentially layers focus progressively back in stages giving increasing levels of defocus away from a subject to give quite a natural depth of field effect. I created it after messing up a shoot with the wrong aperture. 😂"

If you can find it I would be interested to test out as I did this by hand with a duplicate layer with a large amount of gaussian blur and a mask.  
I should have made it as a smart object so I could change the blur.  I always remember half way through the exercise.


There are always many different ways to do stuff in Photoshop it really is a total learning experience.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I thought I would do that one of the Hummingbird moth as I was never sure if I liked the background in the original, but maybe the problem was the crop I made!
I prefer your crop.


Re: " Incidentally, somewhere on my desktop I have a PS Action that sequentially layers focus progressively back in stages giving increasing levels of defocus away from a subject to give quite a natural depth of field effect. I created it after messing up a shoot with the wrong aperture. 😂"

If you can find it I would be interested to test out as I did this by hand with a duplicate layer with a large amount of gaussian blur and a mask.  
I should have made it as a smart object so I could change the blur.  I always remember half way through the exercise.


There are always many different ways to do stuff in Photoshop it really is a total learning experience.
My desktop is out of action at the moment (lack of use) but will see if I can find it elsewhere on a drive.

From 15year memory.......
The process started with tight masking ALL the areas behind the subject.
Apply a minimal blur as the ‘base coat’ start this action..

Contract the mask by 2 pixels > Apply a feather of 1 pixel > Apply 5% more blur
Contract the mask by 4 pixels > Apply a feather of 2 pixel > Apply 5% more blur
Contract the mask by 10 pixels > Apply a feather of 5 pixel > Apply 10% more blur
Contract the mask by 20 pixels > Apply a feather of 10 pixel > Apply 10% more blur
Contract the mask by 50 pixels > Apply a feather of 20 pixel > Apply 15% more blur
Contract the mask by 100 pixels > Apply a feather of 50pixel > Apply 20% more blur

The actual numbers may be wrong but the principal is the same.....ie don’t apply feather to the mask in the first instance, then soften the edge effect by ‘one step forward - half back’ approach, increasing the intensity as you go further back.

There are a couple of pitfalls to watch out for. 
The mask moves away from the frame edges incrementally so you are left with an edge and top that needs a small crop.
If the mask is not horizontal behind the subject lower areas may get more blurring than their distance demands. So using the rectangle mask to subtract these irregularities halfway through the action (or step back afterwards and restart)  irons out this issue.

Of course Adobe may have added this filter to more recent versions ....but I am still old school diy. 😂

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I prefer the first image Eric with the background not blurry. I have tried to get away from the bird etc dominating the image and where the background is acceptable leave it visible as habitat. I totally agree Iain it seems more natural...more like the eye sees it. I think just using fstop to control background detail should be sufficient.

Obviously with location photography, there can often be background detail that distracts that can’t be moved. I favour cloning that item out rather than blurring the whole area.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
My desktop is out of action at the moment (lack of use) but will see if I can find it elsewhere on a drive.

From 15year memory.......
The process started with tight masking ALL the areas behind the subject.
Apply a minimal blur as the ‘base coat’ start this action..

Contract the mask by 2 pixels > Apply a feather of 1 pixel > Apply 5% more blur
Contract the mask by 4 pixels > Apply a feather of 2 pixel > Apply 5% more blur
Contract the mask by 10 pixels > Apply a feather of 5 pixel > Apply 10% more blur
Contract the mask by 20 pixels > Apply a feather of 10 pixel > Apply 10% more blur
Contract the mask by 50 pixels > Apply a feather of 20 pixel > Apply 15% more blur
Contract the mask by 100 pixels > Apply a feather of 50pixel > Apply 20% more blur

The actual numbers may be wrong but the principal is the same.....ie don’t apply feather to the mask in the first instance, then soften the edge effect by ‘one step forward - half back’ approach, increasing the intensity as you go further back.

There are a couple of pitfalls to watch out for. 
The mask moves away from the frame edges incrementally so you are left with an edge and top that needs a small crop.
If the mask is not horizontal behind the subject lower areas may get more blurring than their distance demands. So using the rectangle mask to subtract these irregularities halfway through the action (or step back afterwards and restart)  irons out this issue.

Of course Adobe may have added this filter to more recent versions ....but I am still old school diy. 😂

NB Save the original mask before you start the action so you can reapply it if you need to redo it.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Thanks Eric.

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
WOW, some great photos have been posted recently.

I ended up purchasing a Nikkor 500mm f 5.6 pf lens. It turned up yesterday.

So far I'm pleased with the lens, although having a few issues with the image stabilisation. I have tried both Normal and Sport mode, but I'm still getting a few images with movement in them. It wasn't an issue with the 200-500mm. More practice I guess.

It was overcast this evening after work when I visited the small reserve at the end of our street. Also there were not too many birds around late in the day.

A few snaps from this evening using a D500 with 500mm f 5.6 pf lens


#1 Laughing Kookaburra


#2 Laughing Kookaburra, I'm not sure if it was laughing at me, the camera, or the new lens :-)


#3 Grey Shrike-thrush


#4 Eastern Yellow Robin

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Nice shots Richard.
The 500pf is a lighter lens than the 200-500 and it may be impacting on your stability.... till you get used to it. 
One of the really useful features on the lens, is the memory focus lock buttons that store preset positions.....enabling you to quickly return to that exact focal spot at the press of the button.

I am not a great fan of its bokeh though. I find it a bit unsmooth, and rather artificial 

When coupled with the latest 1.4x teleconverter there is no loss in quality like earlier teleconverter models ...and 720mm reach (1080mm with the d500)

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Thank you Eric!

I don’t have the 1.4x teleconverter, it was on my to buy list a year or two back, but I never got around to it. I do have the 1.7x and the 2x. I might try one of them with one of the Z bodies.

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Some of the images I managed to get this morning at one of our local gardens.

D500 with 500mm f/5.6


#1 Striated Pardalote


#2 Spotted Pardalote


#3 Eastern Spinebill


#4 Red-browed Scrubwren


#5 Eastern Yellow Robin


#6 Little Wattlebird


#7 Grey Shrike-thrush


#8 Superb Fairy-wren


#9 White-browed Scrubwren


#10 New Holland Honeyeater


#11 Silvereye


#12 Welcome Swallow


#13 Brown Thornbill


#14 Southern Brown Bandicoot (Please delete if not appropriate)

Last edited on Sat Feb 27th, 2021 04:48 by Richard_M

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Never saw a Bandicoot when I was in Oz.  I probably did but dismissed it as a rat!   Not a lover of rats and mice.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Willow Tit and Blue Tit


DN4_1534 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr


DN4_1479-Edit by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Last edited on Tue Mar 9th, 2021 13:06 by Iain

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
Eric's Jays



Click here to comment on this image.





Click here to comment on this image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline

Click here to comment on this image.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Beautiful shot,  Eric.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Nice shots Eric.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
The Redpolls have been showing well and this one is ready for the females.

D72_4830 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
The Redpolls have been showing well and this one is ready for the females.

D72_4830 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr
What a lovely fellow! ( the Redpoll Iain 😂)

The recent gales brought a load of redpolls and siskins into this area.
We’ve even had them in the garden this last week or so ....for the first time in 30years! 

They actually used to nest in our garden back in the 80s along with spotted flycatchers and even linnets. 
Unfortunately the allotments on the other side of our fence were all built on and as you can imagine the small birds disappeared.

You have captured your male in a lovely woodland setting. Excellent.

Unfortunately they only came to us for the feeders this time. 😞


I love their black legs!



Click here to comment on this image.

Last edited on Wed Mar 24th, 2021 22:39 by Eric

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Scarlet Robin

#1


#2


#3

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Richard_M wrote:
Scarlet Robin

#1


#2


#3
What a spectacular bird...so different in colour to our own Robin but unmistakely a Robin. Very good.

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
What a spectacular bird...so different in colour to our own Robin but unmistakely a Robin. Very good. Thank you @Eric

We do get a few different red Robin's locally, so far I have only seen and photographed two varieties

This link has some info on the various Robin's

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
It was raining and overcast today. Nice light for many of the birds

#1 Eastern Yellow Robin


#2 Welcome Swallow


#3 New Holland Honeyeater


#4 Little Wattlebird


#5 White-browed Scrubwren


#6 Superb Fairy-wren

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Great shot of the Little Wattlebird.
Actually they are all pretty darn good.  Better than my efforts!

Richard_M

 

Joined: Wed Oct 14th, 2020
Location: Australia
Posts: 56
Status: 
Offline
Great shot of the Little Wattlebird.
Actually they are all pretty darn good.  Better than my efforts!
Thank You!

I managed to get a Rose Robin today

#1 Rose Robin (Male)



#2 Rose Robin (Female)




#3 King-Parrot

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
First shot with my new Sony Flagship A1 Mirrorless camera I have done a post in Cameras all about the new camera up loaded it twice and it is NOT there what is wrong?

Click here to comment on this image.

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
Did you select a make tag in the new topic post???

If not it will not have posted but taken you back to preview in the editor.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
No did not know that, had enough for one night will try again in the morning. As you see the picture uploaded several times!!!

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
Sorry Graham - I have now put up a member announcement to warn people!

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Looks like it is fairly detailed but we need to see a sectional enlargement as the forum software doesnt allow full size images to be uploaded.

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Looks like it is fairly detailed but we need to see a sectional enlargement as the forum software doesnt allow full size images to be uploaded. Yes it does - but the image in the thread is limited to its container size - to see the full size image, in this case 1568 x 1200 px, right click on the image then view image and click on the viewed image - that should take you to full size.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
A male Sparrowhawk in flight.

D72_5253 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
A male Sparrowhawk in flight.

D72_5253 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr
Well caught Iain. I normally just see it’s bum disappearing into the distance....before I even get the camera out. 😢

Last edited on Fri Apr 2nd, 2021 16:54 by Eric

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Well caught Iain. I normally just see it’s bum disappearing into the distance....before I even get the camera out. 😢 Just happened to be in the right place at the right time.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
Just happened to be in the right place at the right time. That sounds like a Gary Player sort of statement, when told he had been ‘lucky’.  

He replied.... “ the harder I practise, the luckier I get”. ;-)

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
A first for our garden, grabbing some of the out of date sliced meat😳



Click here to comment on this image.

Who would have thought it....a Cannibal!

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Pull!
:lol::devil:

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:'
Pull!
:lol::devil:

Now you have scared him!



Click here to comment on this image.

Was considering feeding him some turkey and go for a 3 bird roast at the weekend. :lol:

Last edited on Thu Apr 8th, 2021 18:37 by Eric

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
He / She’s back......



Click here to comment on this image.

And no depth of field either ...600mm at 3 metres. Didnt have time or the lighting to stop right down. He / She was gone in 10 seconds.

Here’s another flick of its head...



Click here to comment on this image.

According to my depth of field tables.....a Wrens beak is just 10mm long. 🤔

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
AF certainly working well.
3m/10ft is a very short working distance for a 200-600mm.
Very impressive shot.

Are you sure you need that A1?
Sony have just updated the back screen on a lot of their top models e.g. a7r-iv-a,  there is going to be some old stock going cheap!
https://www.dpreview.com/news/8756997638/sony-quietly-updates-the-a7r-iii-a7r-iv-with-improved-lcd-displays

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Don’t ‘need’ another camera at all.
But given the chance, I would welcome evaluating one.

It does reinforce the fact that if you get close enough to the subject you have greater chance of success.
I just wish I had left the camera on f16 .....so when I grabbed it I could have got more of the wren’s head in focus. :banghead:

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I dont think that f16 would have helped unless you have AutoISO enabled as well.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I dont think that f16 would have helped unless you have AutoISO enabled as well. I do have auto iso enabled.
I run in Manual mode, setting shutter and fstop for the subject and my requirements...letting the iso drift.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Male Kestrel in flight.



DN4_2549-Edit by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
few from yesterday using olympus omd1.mkii + olympus 100-400 lens hand held 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
some from the other day back to one of my fave spots, now I can leave Wales once again

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
some more from Saturday 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
A nice set of pic's Jeff.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
Cheers iaian

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
A first for me today was this Wryneck, not easy to get a shot of.

DN4_3406 by Iain Clyne, on Flickr

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Good set of pixs Jeff. Like that Ian never seen one, no easy to see!

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
I found it with my bins then looked through the camera, even though I knew where it was it took some finding with the camera. It’s camo is amazing.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I found it with my bins then looked through the camera, even though I knew where it was it took some finding with the camera. It’s camo is amazing. I saw one in Alsace hopping up between the grape vines some years ago. I had totally missed it and it didn’t seem bothered about me. Unfortunately I was shooting infra red wide angle and not equipped for bird photography back then.

We had a Hoopoe in the recreational garden across the road from us, yesterday (according to Norfolk Birdline).

I hung my iPad out of the window and played the distinctive Hoopoe call off my bird song app for ages to no avail. Of course one doesn’t know exactly what the recording was ‘saying’. It could have told it to b*gger off......it seems to have done that anyway. 😂

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
The fact that it didn’t show that is probably what it was saying.🤣🤣

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Still trying to get to grips with the Sony, and a zoom lens! I keep forgetting the flexibility of the 200-600 available range. 

Ordinarily it sits at 600 and I can sometimes struggle to leave sufficient surround to frame the bird forgetting I can zoom out.

This time I did the opposite!

Trying to capture a young Dunnock flitting about the tree, I managed to get this shot which later required about a 25-50% crop. 

Then I realised I had the lens set at 300mm 🤬

It’s hard breaking the habits of a life time ….in this case prime lens v zoom flexibility.



Click here to comment on this image.


Couldn’t help feeling sorry for this scruffy Bluetit.

Going in and out of its nest hole to feed its brood has taken a toll on its appearance…




Click here to comment on this image.



Another Dunnock foraging in the bushes…..



Click here to comment on this image.


I don’t really know where all this bright light is coming from!  I had to get the iso down into 3 digits for a change.


Here’s another baby…..



Click here to comment on this image.



Not sure we should be including ‘caged bird’ photos, but anyway here’s my version. 😀





Click here to comment on this image.


That’s enough…back to weeding the garden. 😞

Last edited on Mon Jun 7th, 2021 09:50 by Eric

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Eric, Are you on the A7iii or A1?

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric, Are you on the A7iii or A1? I think it’s the A7iii that Eric has.

chrisbet



Joined: Fri Feb 8th, 2019
Location: Leigh On Sea, Essex , United Kingdom
Posts: 1019
Status: 
Offline
Thief!! Good job the dogs weren't there to witness some of their breakfast going awol!



Click here to comment on this image.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
update I had a warranty problem with my olympus 1-mkii in the grip coming off , sent back for repair which took nearly a month to get there and back .. in frustration at being camera-less I bought a mk3 body from h.dew ..both arrived on the same day .. ah so ..anyway its taken me a few weeks to adjust to the new body ,weather, birds breeding, family stuff etc .. and am just really starting to gel with it now .hence no posts of late . heres a from this week .please note the gannet in flight shot does not contain sensor dust bunnies its millions of flies on the cliffs at bempton 

Click here to comment on this image.


Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Excellent shots Jeff.  I must get up to Bempton again.  Haven’t been there for 30 years😳


I’ve been trying to locate a Tawny Owl thats been keeping down the rodents in our garden. We regularly hear them at night but of late the blackbirds have been pinking away down in our woodland corner during the daytime.

Not easy to find and even harder to get a clear line of sight. So not perfect photo…..but a nice ‘garden’ bird and first for us!





Click here to comment on this image.

blackfox



Joined: Thu Apr 12th, 2012
Location: Flint, North Wales, United Kingdom
Posts: 1173
Status: 
Offline
Eric wrote:
Excellent shots Jeff.  I must get up to Bempton again.  Haven’t been there for 30 years😳


I’ve been trying to locate a Tawny Owl thats been keeping down the rodents in our garden. We regularly hear them at night but of late the blackbirds have been pinking away down in our woodland corner during the daytime.

Not easy to find and even harder to get a clear line of sight. So not perfect photo…..but a nice ‘garden’ bird and first for us!





Click here to comment on this image.
It’s changed a lot in the few years since my last visit Eric , we did a 4.30a.m cross country dash and got there early someone that arrived at 9.a.m got the last car parking spot .. horrendous amount of people there by mid day

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
blackfox wrote:
It’s changed a lot in the few years since my last visit Eric , we did a 4.30a.m cross country dash and got there early someone that arrived at 9.a.m got the last car parking spot .. horrendous amount of people there by mid day It’s like that on the NNorfolk coast too.

Crocodiles of people wandering about at Titchwell and other vantage points.
Springwatch hasn’t helped, with thousands of numpties thinking they can turn up at Snettisham and see what the BBC crew are seeing live.

I fear this won’t calm down till people lose interest with holidaying in UK and resuming jetting off to far flung places….and get back to work.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Think the owl has the right idea….close your eyes and chill.

It was really dark in this spot. This needed 12,800 iso even at 1/100th


.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
Eric, can you post which camera you are using when you post from your two cameras!  Profligate! 
:lol:

I am trying to work out if I can see a difference between the cameras.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
That’s a nice bird to have in your garden.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Super pictures Jeff, thanks for posting them! I have been very busy sorting garden and sorry no new pix from me.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
One from today. This Kite is called Red Arrow and will be 16 years old this year.



Click here to comment on this image.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
Eric, can you post which camera you are using when you post from your two cameras!  Profligate! 
:lol:

I am trying to work out if I can see a difference between the cameras.
Can’t help you with a comparison as I am only using one camera. :devil:

Besides these posted images are no real comparison to the originals. I am letting the forum software create 1-2mb ‘large size’ uploads from the massively bigger originals. There’s no doubt it reduces quality using this route. 


Click here to comment on this image.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
Eric that is spot on quality!

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
That looks good to me Eric.

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
I’m waiting to see some bird in flight pics from you Sony users to see how it handles it.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Graham Whistler wrote:
Eric that is spot on quality! That was using the bird eye focusing feature.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
I’m waiting to see some bird in flight pics from you Sony users to see how it handles it. I am afraid there isn’t a lot of variety in flying birds over the garden it’s mainly gulls…..




Click here to comment on this image.



Click here to comment on this image.

The Sony tracking system is very good and follows the bird all round the screen, holding lock. I haven’t had a lot of opportunity to try other birds but I am not sure I have the right mode on the stabilisation system for chasing a fast bird around the blue yonder because images of fast flying birds (I was chasing Swift’s around 2 days ago and nearly pulled my neck muscles ) havent come out too sharp.
Kites and Buzzards are starting to venture over the garden but I generally only get one chance as they don’t hang about.  
I need to get up the coast to tackle sea birds….but I am not going there while the world and his wife (and kids) are thrashing about in the reserves.  

I also think the 200-600 lens I have is too long and heavy for bif.
Graham has the 100-400 and it’s 2/3 of the size and weight. I may have to treat myself. 

Changing to mirrorless is not without its frustrations. I am however learning to adapt to its idiosyncrasies more and have configured several of the custom buttons around the body and lens to speed up the way I shoot, access menus and review captured images. For example the AE hold button under the right thumb of most cameras I never use …so I have assigned it to playback the last image in the viewfinder. ( I don’t use the rear screen anymore as it wastes power and the viewfinder is so good you get a better, clearer assessment than struggling with the rear screen in sun!

I don’t believe the performance on moving subjects is any worse than the d850 and d500….it’s probably much better, but getting the right settings to optimise quality and performance takes time and I don’t feel I have achieved that yet, merely testing in the garden.

Graham Whistler



Joined: Sat Apr 14th, 2012
Location: Fareham, United Kingdom
Posts: 1482
Status: 
Offline
I would agree with all Eric has said there. I have had a very busy 4 weeks with major work being done in the house and garden with little time to rake photos. I did flying tests with the high 200-600mm and results were good, but lens is a bit large.  I also now have the very good Sony 100-400 and that should make life a bit better for and 80 yr old to handle for fast-flying action. Hope to report more later but this A1 is a super camera with a lot of new things to learn to get the best out of it.

jk



Joined: Mon Apr 2nd, 2012
Location: Carthew, Cornwall, United Kingdom
Posts: 6601
Status: 
Offline
I think Eric's seagulls are nice and sharp but they are fairly large birds.  A dunnock, kingfisher or sandpiper are the best test targets that can prove how good the Sony is.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
jk wrote:
I think Eric's seagulls are nice and sharp butthey are fairly large birds.  A kingfisher or sandpiper are the best test targets that prove how good the Sony is. Unless you have a good vantage point, near a place where the bird returns predictably, you will struggle getting any good bif shots of a small bird, no matter what camera you are using. Small birds are, due to their need to avoid predators, unpredictable in flight behaviour. Even approaching garden feeders they take different routes that mean you are hard pressed to see them soon enough to lock onto them in the first instance. 

l start from the stance that Sony seem no worse than the D500 and better than the D850 at tracking bird movement. Focus is quicker with the Sony but it remains to be seen whether with practise and familiarity it has overall superiority.  

Like I said, I need to get to a location with a melee of flying birds, to progress. 

Right now that’s not possible as my car is spending its third week in the dealership garage while they do the ‘warranty sidestep’.  That’s when they change the oil, stroke the bearings and plead with the transfer box to get better, rather than coughing up and replacing the whole unit. 🤬

Last edited on Fri Jun 18th, 2021 18:38 by Eric

Iain



Joined: Fri Apr 6th, 2012
Location: Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Posts: 1015
Status: 
Offline
Eric’s gulls look as good as my BIF shots.

Eric



Joined: Thu Apr 19th, 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3620
Status: 
Offline
Iain wrote:
Eric’s gulls look as good as my BIF shots. Iain, in your experience, how small a bird have you managed to capture in flight? The smallest I have managed is a Jackdaw.

I am guessing a Kingfisher would be quite small, but you still need to know where it’s nesting or it’s fishing post, as they fly like bullets.


Current theme is Blue



A small amount of member data is captured and held in an attempt to reduce spammers and to manage users. This site also uses cookies to ensure ease of use. In order to comply with new DPR regulations you are required to agree/disagree with this process. If you do not agree then please email the Admins using info@nikon-dslr.net Thank you.



UltraBB 1.172 Copyright © 2007-2011 Data 1 Systems
Page processed in 0.9395 seconds (48% database + 52% PHP). 810 queries executed.